|
This file is available on a Cryptome DVD offered by Cryptome. Donate $25 for a DVD of the Cryptome 10-year archives of 35,000 files from June 1996 to June 2006 (~3.5 GB). Click Paypal or mail check/MO made out to John Young, 251 West 89th Street, New York, NY 10024. Archives include all files of cryptome.org, cryptome2.org, jya.com, cartome.org, eyeball-series.org and iraq-kill-maim.org. Cryptome offers with the Cryptome DVD an INSCOM DVD of about 18,000 pages of counter-intelligence dossiers declassified by the US Army Information and Security Command, dating from 1945 to 1985. No additional contribution required -- $25 for both. The DVDs will be sent anywhere worldwide without extra cost. | |||
28 June 2000
[Federal Register: June 28, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 125)]
[Notices]
[Page 39887]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr28jn00-60]
[[Page 39887]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
Meeting of the Advisory Panel To Assess the Capabilities for
Domestic Response to Terrorist Attacks Involving Weapons of Mass
Destruction
ACTION: Notice of meeting.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the schedule and summary agenda for the
next meeting of the Panel to Assess the Capabilities for Domestic
Response to Terrorist Attacks Involving Weapons of Mass Destruction.
Notice of this meeting is required under the Federal Advisory Committee
Act. (Pub. L. 92-463).
DATES: July 17 and 18, 2000.
ADDRESSES: RAND, 1200 South Hayes Street, Arlington, VA 22202-5050.
PROPOSED SCHEDULE AND AGENDA: Panel to Assess the Capabilities for
Domestic Response to Terrorist Attacks Involving Weapons of Mass
Destruction will meet from 9 a.m. until 5 p.m. on July 17, 2000, and
from 9 a.m. until 2 p.m. on July 18, 2000. Time will be allocated for
public comments by individuals or organizations.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RAND provides information about this
Panel on its web site at http://www.rand.org/organization/nsrd/
terrpanel; it can also be reached at (703) 413-1100 extension 5282.
Public comment presentations will be limited to two minutes each and
must be provided in writing prior to the meeting. Mail written
presentations and requests to register to attend the open public
session to: Priscilla Schlegel, RAND, 1200 South Hayes Street,
Arlington, VA 22202-5050. Public seating for this meeting is limited,
and is available on a first-come first-served basis.
Dated: June 22, 2000.
L.M. Bynum,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 00-16260 Filed 6-27-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5601-10-M
[Federal Register: June 28, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 125)]
[Notices]
[Page 39887]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr28jn00-61]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
Defense Science Board
ACTION: Notice of Advisory Committee meeting.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board (DSB) Task Force on Unconventional
Nuclear Warfare Defense will meet in closed session on July 10-11,
2000, at Strategic Analysis, Inc., 3601 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 500,
Arlington, VA. This Task Force will determine the adequacy of DoD's
ability to detect, identify, respond, and prevent unconventional
nuclear attacks by terrorists or subnational entities, and the
appropriate role(s) and capability of DoD to provide protection against
unconventional nuclear attacks in support of homeland defense.
The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary
of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition,
Technology & Logistics on scientific and technical matters as they
affect the perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At these
meetings, the Defense Science Board Task Force will review and evaluate
the Department's ability to provide information.
In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee
Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II, (1994)), it has
been determined that these Defense Science Board meetings, concern
matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) (1994), and that accordingly
these meetings will be closed to the public.
Dated: June 22, 2000.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 00-16259 Filed 6-27-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
[Federal Register: June 28, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 125)]
[Notices]
[Page 39901-39902]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr28jn00-80]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Children's Online Privacy Protection Safe Harbor Proposed Self-
Regulatory Guidelines; ESRB Privacy Online, a Division of the
Entertainment Software Rating Board
AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice of Proposed ``Safe Harbor'' Guidelines and Request for
Public Comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Trade Commission publishes this notice and request
for public comment concerning proposed self-regulatory guidelines
submitted by ESRB Privacy Online, a division of the Entertainment
Software Rating Board (``ESRB''), under the safe harbor provision of
the Children's
[[Page 39902]]
Online Privacy Protection Rule, 16 CFR 312.10.
DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before July 31, 2000.
Comments will be posted on the Commission's web site: http://
www.ftc.gov>.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should be submitted to: Secretary, Federal
Trade Commission, Room H-159, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington,
DC 20580. The Commission requests that commenters submit the original
plus five copies, if feasible. To enable prompt review and public
access, comments also should be submitted, if possible, in electronic
form, on either a 5\1/4\ or a 3\1/2\ inch computer disk, with a disk
label stating the name of the commenter and the name and version of the
word processing program used to create the document. (Programs based on
DOS or Windows are preferred. Files from other operating systems should
be submitted in ASCII text format.) Alternatively, the Commission will
accept comments submitted to the following e-mail address,
safeharbor@ftc.gov>. Individual members of the public filing comments
need not submit multiple copies or comments in electronic form. All
submissions should be captioned: ``ESRB Safe Harbor Proposal-- Comment,
P004504.''
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Toby Levin, (202) 326-3156, Abbe
Goldstein, (202) 326-3423, or Karen Muoio, (202) 326-2491, Division of
Advertising Practices, Bureau of Consumer Protection, Federal Trade
Commission, 601 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20580.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Section A. Background
On October 20, 1999, the Commission issued its final Rule \1\
pursuant to the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act, 15 U.S.C.
6501, et seq. The Rule requires certain web site operators to post
privacy policies, provide notice, and obtain parental consent prior to
collecting, using, or disseminating personal information from children.
The Rule contains a ``safe harbor'' provision enabling industry groups
or others to submit self-regulatory guidelines that would implement the
protections of the Rule to the commission for approval.\2\
Pursuant to Section 312.10 of the Rule, ESRB has submitted proposed
self-regulatory guidelines to the Commission for approval. The full
text of the proposed guidelines is available on the Commission's
website, www.ftc.gov>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 64 FR 59888 (1999).
\2\ See 16 CFR 312.10; 64 FR 59906-59908, 59915.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section B. Questions on the Proposed Guidelines
The Commission is seeking comment on various aspects of the
proposed guidelines, and is particularly interested in receiving
comment on the questions that follow. These questions are designed to
assist the public and should not be construed as a limitation on the
issues on which public comment may be submitted. Responses to these
questions should cite the numbers and subsection of the questions being
answered. For all comments submitted, please provide any relevant data,
statistics, or any other evidence, upon which those comments are based.
1. Please provide comment on any or all of the provisions in the
proposed guidelines. For each provision commented on please describe
(a) the impact of the provision(s) (including any benefits and costs),
if any, and (b) what alternatives, if any, ESRB, should consider, as
well as the costs and benefits of those alternatives.
2. Do the provisions of the proposed guidelines governing
operators' information practices provide ``the same or greater
protections for children'' as those contained in Sections 312.2-312.8
of the Rule? \3\ Where possible, please cite the relevant sections of
both the Rule and the proposed guidelines.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See 16 CFR 312.10(b)(1); 64 FR 59915.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Are the mechanisms used to assess operators' compliance with the
guidelines effective? \4\ If not, please describe (a) how the proposed
guidelines could be modified to satisfy the Rule's requirements, and
(b) the costs and benefits of those modifications.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See 16 CFR 312.10(b)(2); 64 FR 59915.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Are the incentives for operators' compliance with the guidelines
effective? \5\ If not, please describe (a) how the proposed guidelines
could be modified to satisfy the Rule's requirements, and (b) the costs
and benefits of those modifications.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See 16 CFR 312.10(b)(3); 64 FR 59915.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. Do the guidelines provide adequate means for resolving consumer
complaints? If not, please describe (a) how the proposed guidelines
could be modified to resolve consumer complaints adequately, and (b)
the costs and benefits of those modifications.
By direction of the Commission.
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-16307 Filed 6-27-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-M